<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64311</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on computing profits from the industrial undertaking and allowing the deduction for bad debts written off by the assessee. The Tribunal modified the allocation method for certain expenses to ensure only those directly related to the industrial activity were considered for profit computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64311</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on computing profits from the industrial undertaking and allowing the deduction for bad debts written off by the assessee. The Tribunal modified the allocation method for certain expenses to ensure only those directly related to the industrial activity were considered for profit computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>