<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 336 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64297</link>
    <description>Block-assessment additions require incriminating material establishing undisclosed income; valuation reports and estimated sale consideration cannot alone prove unrecorded receipts where recorded consideration is confirmed and books are not rejected. FDRs, cash credits, related interest and cash expenses supported by books, confirmations and seized material cannot be treated as undisclosed income without proof of transactions outside the recorded accounts. Interest under section 158BFA(1) cannot be demanded unless specifically determined by an order; penalty initiation is insufficient. The discussed additions and interest demand were deleted, while one issue was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 10:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 336 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64297</link>
      <description>Block-assessment additions require incriminating material establishing undisclosed income; valuation reports and estimated sale consideration cannot alone prove unrecorded receipts where recorded consideration is confirmed and books are not rejected. FDRs, cash credits, related interest and cash expenses supported by books, confirmations and seized material cannot be treated as undisclosed income without proof of transactions outside the recorded accounts. Interest under section 158BFA(1) cannot be demanded unless specifically determined by an order; penalty initiation is insufficient. The discussed additions and interest demand were deleted, while one issue was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>