<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64284</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the deletion of additions of Rs. 3.80 crores and Rs. 1,71,53,938 based on insufficient evidence. The matter of Rs. 10,60,000, added as undisclosed income from gifts, was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination regarding the genuineness and donor&#039;s capacity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 164 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64284</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the deletion of additions of Rs. 3.80 crores and Rs. 1,71,53,938 based on insufficient evidence. The matter of Rs. 10,60,000, added as undisclosed income from gifts, was remanded to the Assessing Officer for further examination regarding the genuineness and donor&#039;s capacity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>