<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax wrongly exercised jurisdiction under section 263. It was found that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and assessments, and the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked material evidence to support the claim of erroneous and prejudicial orders. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and allowed the appeals of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 18:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 122 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Income Tax wrongly exercised jurisdiction under section 263. It was found that the Assessing Officer had conducted proper inquiries and assessments, and the Commissioner&#039;s order lacked material evidence to support the claim of erroneous and prejudicial orders. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s order under section 263 and allowed the appeals of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>