<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of a foreign company by condoning the delay in filing the appeal, citing a bona fide belief in the correctness of the assessment and the subsequent legal developments. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) to consider the merits of the tax liability and refund claim, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 17:21:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal of a foreign company by condoning the delay in filing the appeal, citing a bona fide belief in the correctness of the assessment and the subsequent legal developments. The case was remanded to the CIT(A) to consider the merits of the tax liability and refund claim, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice over technicalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>