<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64256</link>
    <description>Trading addition based on alleged excess stock found during a survey was found unsustainable where no unaccounted purchases, sales, or other incriminating material emerged to displace the book results. The Assessing Officer&#039;s approach of valuing stock by applying a gross profit rate to the survey stock list was treated as an erroneous method for estimating excess stock. On that basis, the addition lacked a proper evidentiary foundation and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 16:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (4) TMI 109 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64256</link>
      <description>Trading addition based on alleged excess stock found during a survey was found unsustainable where no unaccounted purchases, sales, or other incriminating material emerged to displace the book results. The Assessing Officer&#039;s approach of valuing stock by applying a gross profit rate to the survey stock list was treated as an erroneous method for estimating excess stock. On that basis, the addition lacked a proper evidentiary foundation and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>