<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied relief under sections 80HHA and 80-I for cash compensatory support and income from the sale of import licenses, following precedents. Duty drawback receipts were included in profits for deductions. Disallowances for testing charges, personal use expenses, damages, and foreign travel were upheld or reversed based on evidence. Relief computation methods were adjusted, and simultaneous deductions under sections 80J and 80-I were clarified. Interest charges were canceled. A dissenting opinion argued for inclusion of compensatory support and sale income in eligible profits. The matter was referred to the President for a Third Member&#039;s opinion, which favored inclusion based on legislative intent and pro-assessee interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:37:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied relief under sections 80HHA and 80-I for cash compensatory support and income from the sale of import licenses, following precedents. Duty drawback receipts were included in profits for deductions. Disallowances for testing charges, personal use expenses, damages, and foreign travel were upheld or reversed based on evidence. Relief computation methods were adjusted, and simultaneous deductions under sections 80J and 80-I were clarified. Interest charges were canceled. A dissenting opinion argued for inclusion of compensatory support and sale income in eligible profits. The matter was referred to the President for a Third Member&#039;s opinion, which favored inclusion based on legislative intent and pro-assessee interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>