<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64222</link>
    <description>A charitable trust&#039;s exemption under sections 11 and 12 was treated as unavailable only for a technical defect if the audit report was not filed with the return but was submitted before assessment was completed; substantial compliance with section 12A(b) was accepted, so the exemption could not be denied on that ground. Donations supported by confirmations showing a specific direction that they form part of the corpus were treated as corpus receipts under section 2(24)(iia) and excluded from income, so the identified donations were not taxable income of the trust. The interest issue was consequential and required recomputation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 15:17:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 204 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64222</link>
      <description>A charitable trust&#039;s exemption under sections 11 and 12 was treated as unavailable only for a technical defect if the audit report was not filed with the return but was submitted before assessment was completed; substantial compliance with section 12A(b) was accepted, so the exemption could not be denied on that ground. Donations supported by confirmations showing a specific direction that they form part of the corpus were treated as corpus receipts under section 2(24)(iia) and excluded from income, so the identified donations were not taxable income of the trust. The interest issue was consequential and required recomputation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>