<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64212</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the ITO&#039;s failure to obtain prior approval from the IAC as mandated by the proviso to the section. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of procedural requirements and invalidated the penalty despite finding merit in the concealment of income based on the assessee&#039;s admission during the settlement petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:24:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64212</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the ITO&#039;s failure to obtain prior approval from the IAC as mandated by the proviso to the section. The tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of procedural requirements and invalidated the penalty despite finding merit in the concealment of income based on the assessee&#039;s admission during the settlement petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>