<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64206</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for both assessment years, ruling in favor of the firm, M/s Space-onix. It determined that Smt. Meena Kanika, the partner in question, was not a benamidar of her husband and had validly contributed capital to the firm. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing that Smt. Meena Kanika was a genuine partner entitled to operate the firm&#039;s bank account independently. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:13:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (4) TMI 108 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64206</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for both assessment years, ruling in favor of the firm, M/s Space-onix. It determined that Smt. Meena Kanika, the partner in question, was not a benamidar of her husband and had validly contributed capital to the firm. The Tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the lower authorities&#039; decisions, emphasizing that Smt. Meena Kanika was a genuine partner entitled to operate the firm&#039;s bank account independently. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>