<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, confirming the cost of acquisition determination based on the previous owner&#039;s cost or fair market value as of January 1, 1964. Ownership was established through adverse possession, supported by a compromise decree acknowledging ownership. The fair market value on specific dates was deemed relevant for computing capital gains, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 13:19:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102641" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 161 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objection, confirming the cost of acquisition determination based on the previous owner&#039;s cost or fair market value as of January 1, 1964. Ownership was established through adverse possession, supported by a compromise decree acknowledging ownership. The fair market value on specific dates was deemed relevant for computing capital gains, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>