<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64189</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) exceeded jurisdiction under section 263 as the Appellate Commissioner&#039;s (AAC) order had merged with the assessment order. The ITAT allowed the appeal, rejecting the CIT&#039;s directions for assessing capital gains. The judgment emphasized jurisdictional boundaries and interpreting tax laws in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 12:58:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 121 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64189</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) exceeded jurisdiction under section 263 as the Appellate Commissioner&#039;s (AAC) order had merged with the assessment order. The ITAT allowed the appeal, rejecting the CIT&#039;s directions for assessing capital gains. The judgment emphasized jurisdictional boundaries and interpreting tax laws in favor of the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>