<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64153</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi-C set aside the AAC&#039;s decision denying registration of a partnership firm under section 185(1)(a) of the IT Act, emphasizing the need for a fair examination of both partners. The tribunal directed a re-examination considering all evidence. Additionally, the inclusion of security amounts in contract receipts was upheld, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument. The determination of the assessee&#039;s status as an Association of Persons (AOP) was linked to the registration issue and was sent back for reconsideration in light of the registration appeal findings. Both appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64153</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi-C set aside the AAC&#039;s decision denying registration of a partnership firm under section 185(1)(a) of the IT Act, emphasizing the need for a fair examination of both partners. The tribunal directed a re-examination considering all evidence. Additionally, the inclusion of security amounts in contract receipts was upheld, rejecting the appellant&#039;s argument. The determination of the assessee&#039;s status as an Association of Persons (AOP) was linked to the registration issue and was sent back for reconsideration in light of the registration appeal findings. Both appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>