<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64149</link>
    <description>Where a jurisdictional objection under section 148 was not examined by the first appellate authority, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and no final finding was recorded. On house property income, the assessee&#039;s returned annual value, consistently accepted in earlier years and supported by an undisputed rateable value, was held to be reasonable; the revenue&#039;s enhancement was therefore unjustified and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 88 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64149</link>
      <description>Where a jurisdictional objection under section 148 was not examined by the first appellate authority, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and no final finding was recorded. On house property income, the assessee&#039;s returned annual value, consistently accepted in earlier years and supported by an undisputed rateable value, was held to be reasonable; the revenue&#039;s enhancement was therefore unjustified and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64149</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>