<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64107</link>
    <description>Registration of a firm cannot be refused merely because partners introduced capital from a Hindu undivided family, if the partnership is genuine, valid and constituted in accordance with the deed. A partnership depends on the parties&#039; agreement, their profit-sharing arrangement, and the real relation disclosed by the instrument and surrounding facts. Where partners entered in their individual capacity, specified their shares, and the business was otherwise real, the source of capital did not negate the firm&#039;s existence. Use of Hindu undivided family funds may be relevant to income assessment, but it does not by itself justify denial of registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 42 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64107</link>
      <description>Registration of a firm cannot be refused merely because partners introduced capital from a Hindu undivided family, if the partnership is genuine, valid and constituted in accordance with the deed. A partnership depends on the parties&#039; agreement, their profit-sharing arrangement, and the real relation disclosed by the instrument and surrounding facts. Where partners entered in their individual capacity, specified their shares, and the business was otherwise real, the source of capital did not negate the firm&#039;s existence. Use of Hindu undivided family funds may be relevant to income assessment, but it does not by itself justify denial of registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>