<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (9) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the penalty of Rs. 28,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the suppression of sales of imported goods. The Tribunal found that while the addition of Rs. 25,000 was justified, the penalty based solely on this material could not be upheld. It emphasized that the Revenue failed to establish that the alleged suppressed sales led to income concealment, and thus, the penalty was deemed unwarranted and deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (9) TMI 63 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and deleting the penalty of Rs. 28,000 imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the suppression of sales of imported goods. The Tribunal found that while the addition of Rs. 25,000 was justified, the penalty based solely on this material could not be upheld. It emphasized that the Revenue failed to establish that the alleged suppressed sales led to income concealment, and thus, the penalty was deemed unwarranted and deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>