<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64104</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that no penalty under section 18(1)(c) was applicable for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. The method of accounting for amounts received from American Express as liabilities was accepted by the Income-tax Officer for previous years, leading to confusion and influencing the assessee&#039;s continued use of the same method. As a result, the penalties imposed for both years were canceled, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64104</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that no penalty under section 18(1)(c) was applicable for the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73. The method of accounting for amounts received from American Express as liabilities was accepted by the Income-tax Officer for previous years, leading to confusion and influencing the assessee&#039;s continued use of the same method. As a result, the penalties imposed for both years were canceled, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>