<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 198 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64097</link>
    <description>The HC determined that the compensation received by the Jain Group from Gillette Inc. was a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt, and thus not taxable under Section 28(i) of the Income-tax Act. The JVA was deemed a capital asset, not a business activity. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 198 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64097</link>
      <description>The HC determined that the compensation received by the Jain Group from Gillette Inc. was a capital receipt, not a revenue receipt, and thus not taxable under Section 28(i) of the Income-tax Act. The JVA was deemed a capital asset, not a business activity. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64097</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>