<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (7) TMI 219 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the penalty for filing delay under section 271(1)(a) but allowed the appeal against the penalty for unexplained cash credits under section 271(1)(c). The judgments highlighted the importance of proving a reasonable cause for delay and the requirement of additional evidence beyond surrender to justify a penalty for concealment of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:44:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (7) TMI 219 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal against the penalty for filing delay under section 271(1)(a) but allowed the appeal against the penalty for unexplained cash credits under section 271(1)(c). The judgments highlighted the importance of proving a reasonable cause for delay and the requirement of additional evidence beyond surrender to justify a penalty for concealment of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>