<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 170 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64091</link>
    <description>Receipt on surrender of tenancy rights acquired without cost was treated as not chargeable to capital gains tax, because no cost of acquisition could be attributed to the tenancy right. The same receipt was also held not to be assessable as casual and non-recurring income under section 10(3), following the Special Bench view applied on those facts. The amended section 55(2) was not applied to impose tax liability for the year in question, so the surrender consideration remained outside taxable income in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:38:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 170 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64091</link>
      <description>Receipt on surrender of tenancy rights acquired without cost was treated as not chargeable to capital gains tax, because no cost of acquisition could be attributed to the tenancy right. The same receipt was also held not to be assessable as casual and non-recurring income under section 10(3), following the Special Bench view applied on those facts. The amended section 55(2) was not applied to impose tax liability for the year in question, so the surrender consideration remained outside taxable income in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>