<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to the issuance of a notice under section 148 beyond the statutory period, as mandated by section 149(3). Consequently, the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) lacked a valid foundation and was annulled. The appellant-assessees&#039; appeals were allowed, resulting in the cancellation of the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 261 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the reassessment proceedings were invalid due to the issuance of a notice under section 148 beyond the statutory period, as mandated by section 149(3). Consequently, the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) lacked a valid foundation and was annulled. The appellant-assessees&#039; appeals were allowed, resulting in the cancellation of the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>