<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64074</link>
    <description>In income-tax proceedings, res judicata does not bar reconsideration of a matter in a later year unless the earlier issue was finally and conclusively decided, so the genuineness of the lease arrangement could be examined again. For determining annual letting value under section 23(1)(a), actual rent is only a guide where the letting is genuine and at arm&#039;s length; on these facts, the stated rent was unreliable, the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimate lacked material support, and municipal rateable value was treated as the proper indicator. The claimed expenditure was disallowed because no material showed it was incidental to business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:06:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 148 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64074</link>
      <description>In income-tax proceedings, res judicata does not bar reconsideration of a matter in a later year unless the earlier issue was finally and conclusively decided, so the genuineness of the lease arrangement could be examined again. For determining annual letting value under section 23(1)(a), actual rent is only a guide where the letting is genuine and at arm&#039;s length; on these facts, the stated rent was unreliable, the Assessing Officer&#039;s estimate lacked material support, and municipal rateable value was treated as the proper indicator. The claimed expenditure was disallowed because no material showed it was incidental to business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>