<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 273 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64068</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order, ruling that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to rescind the registration granted under section 12A. It emphasized that the power to cancel registration must be explicitly conferred by statute, which was absent in this case. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s action was deemed without jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 22:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 273 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64068</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order, ruling that the CIT lacked jurisdiction to rescind the registration granted under section 12A. It emphasized that the power to cancel registration must be explicitly conferred by statute, which was absent in this case. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s action was deemed without jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>