<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 68 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessments and the quantum of wealth determined by the WTO. It confirmed that Part B of the trust fund was indeterminate and liable to be assessed under sub-section (4) of section 21. The Tribunal also clarified that separate assessments should be made for Part A and Part B of the trust funds, applying the appropriate wealth tax rates. The appeals were thus partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:25:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 68 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the reopening of the assessments and the quantum of wealth determined by the WTO. It confirmed that Part B of the trust fund was indeterminate and liable to be assessed under sub-section (4) of section 21. The Tribunal also clarified that separate assessments should be made for Part A and Part B of the trust funds, applying the appropriate wealth tax rates. The appeals were thus partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>