<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64042</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty orders issued by the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi, due to lack of jurisdiction. The appellant&#039;s belief that TDS was not required on emoluments paid in Japan was deemed reasonable, based on legal advice and consultations, leading to the cancellation of penalties under section 271C. All appeals of the appellant were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64042</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty orders issued by the Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi, due to lack of jurisdiction. The appellant&#039;s belief that TDS was not required on emoluments paid in Japan was deemed reasonable, based on legal advice and consultations, leading to the cancellation of penalties under section 271C. All appeals of the appellant were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>