<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 228 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming disallowances under Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B for delayed provident fund contributions, fines, penalties, and ESI contributions. However, it ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the subscription to Gymkhana club expenses. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses as entertainment expenditure was also upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:09:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 228 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, confirming disallowances under Sections 36(1)(va) and 43B for delayed provident fund contributions, fines, penalties, and ESI contributions. However, it ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the subscription to Gymkhana club expenses. The disallowance of sales promotion expenses as entertainment expenditure was also upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>