<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 162 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax penalty case. The disallowed expenditures on plant &amp;amp; machinery, interest on FDRs, provision for gratuity fund, share issue expenses, and survey expenses were found to be bona fide claims with all material particulars disclosed. The Tribunal deemed the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as illegal and invalid, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:34:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 162 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax penalty case. The disallowed expenditures on plant &amp;amp; machinery, interest on FDRs, provision for gratuity fund, share issue expenses, and survey expenses were found to be bona fide claims with all material particulars disclosed. The Tribunal deemed the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as illegal and invalid, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=64024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>