<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (11) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital borrowed for business purposes. It held that interest paid before assets were put to use did not need to be capitalized under Explanation 8 to section 43(1). The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the AO&#039;s decision, permitting the interest deduction. The appeal favored the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 10:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (11) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the deduction of interest under section 36(1)(iii) for capital borrowed for business purposes. It held that interest paid before assets were put to use did not need to be capitalized under Explanation 8 to section 43(1). The Tribunal set aside the CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored the AO&#039;s decision, permitting the interest deduction. The appeal favored the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>