<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 118 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the revenue regarding penalties for late filing but against them for concealment of income. The Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside the penalty for concealment was deemed illegal, and penalties for late filing were reassessed under section 271(1) of the Act. The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty for concealment but directed a reassessment of late filing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:44:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 118 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially ruled in favor of the revenue regarding penalties for late filing but against them for concealment of income. The Commissioner&#039;s order setting aside the penalty for concealment was deemed illegal, and penalties for late filing were reassessed under section 271(1) of the Act. The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty for concealment but directed a reassessment of late filing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>