<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 181 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, canceling the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for all four assessees. It held that the explanation provided by the assessees regarding the treatment of loans as income from undisclosed sources was bona fide, and there was no material evidence of concealment of income. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked satisfaction for the imposition of penalties based on the enhanced income discovered by the AAC, following the decision of the Allahabad High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:11:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 181 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, canceling the penalties imposed under section 271(1)(c) for all four assessees. It held that the explanation provided by the assessees regarding the treatment of loans as income from undisclosed sources was bona fide, and there was no material evidence of concealment of income. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer lacked satisfaction for the imposition of penalties based on the enhanced income discovered by the AAC, following the decision of the Allahabad High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>