<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63951</link>
    <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1981-82. The penalty of Rs. 12,500 was confirmed due to inconsistencies in the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of income from the sale of jewellery. The court found the changing explanations and lack of supporting evidence rendered the assessee&#039;s explanation not bona fide, leading to the penalty being upheld based on the provisions of Explanation 1 to section 271(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 18:04:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 143 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63951</link>
      <description>The court upheld the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1981-82. The penalty of Rs. 12,500 was confirmed due to inconsistencies in the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the source of income from the sale of jewellery. The court found the changing explanations and lack of supporting evidence rendered the assessee&#039;s explanation not bona fide, leading to the penalty being upheld based on the provisions of Explanation 1 to section 271(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>