<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (7) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63940</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by revisiting an addition already confirmed by the ITAT. The original assessment was upheld, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal also ruled that interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 could not be levied in reassessment proceedings, but any interest from the original assessment would stand. The cross-objection challenging interest in reassessment was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:45:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (7) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63940</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) exceeded jurisdiction by revisiting an addition already confirmed by the ITAT. The original assessment was upheld, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was set aside. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed. The Tribunal also ruled that interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 could not be levied in reassessment proceedings, but any interest from the original assessment would stand. The cross-objection challenging interest in reassessment was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>