<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63911</link>
    <description>A partition cannot be validly effected between a sole male coparcener and his wife in a Hindu undivided family, because the wife has no partitionable coparcenary share in the same manner as a coparcener. The memorandum of partition was therefore void, and the assets said to pass under it continued to belong to the HUF; on that basis, the amounts transferred to the daughter could not be taxed as gifts in the HUF&#039;s hands. Reassessment under the Gift-tax Act was also treated as validly initiated on the footing of incomplete disclosure, but that did not alter the substantive position that no gift-tax addition could survive against the HUF.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 114 - ITAT DELHI-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63911</link>
      <description>A partition cannot be validly effected between a sole male coparcener and his wife in a Hindu undivided family, because the wife has no partitionable coparcenary share in the same manner as a coparcener. The memorandum of partition was therefore void, and the assets said to pass under it continued to belong to the HUF; on that basis, the amounts transferred to the daughter could not be taxed as gifts in the HUF&#039;s hands. Reassessment under the Gift-tax Act was also treated as validly initiated on the footing of incomplete disclosure, but that did not alter the substantive position that no gift-tax addition could survive against the HUF.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63911</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>