<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 252 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed multiple banking-tax issues, including deductibility of overseas mobilisation expenses for NRI deposits, classification of rental receipts from let-out properties, and the scope of deduction under section 36(1)(viia). It held that employee training hotel expenses were outside section 37(3) read with Rule 6D, club subscription and periodical fees were allowable business expenditure, and exemption for foreign currency syndicated loan fees was supportable on the material produced. It also held that interest payable to head office was not deductible and that alleged foreign branch credit card commission income was not taxable in India. Certain deductions under sections 36(1)(viia) and 44C were to be recomputed on finally determined income, and one issue was remanded for factual verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 252 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed multiple banking-tax issues, including deductibility of overseas mobilisation expenses for NRI deposits, classification of rental receipts from let-out properties, and the scope of deduction under section 36(1)(viia). It held that employee training hotel expenses were outside section 37(3) read with Rule 6D, club subscription and periodical fees were allowable business expenditure, and exemption for foreign currency syndicated loan fees was supportable on the material produced. It also held that interest payable to head office was not deductible and that alleged foreign branch credit card commission income was not taxable in India. Certain deductions under sections 36(1)(viia) and 44C were to be recomputed on finally determined income, and one issue was remanded for factual verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>