<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 301 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, determining that the transactions in question were financial rather than trading in nature. Consequently, the application of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act was deemed inappropriate. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 4,67,400, concluding that the authorities had erred in invoking section 40A(3) for these transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 301 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, determining that the transactions in question were financial rather than trading in nature. Consequently, the application of section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act was deemed inappropriate. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition of Rs. 4,67,400, concluding that the authorities had erred in invoking section 40A(3) for these transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>