<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63843</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi-B allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the time-barred penalty order of Rs. 4,25,313 under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1998-99. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment order cannot be the subject of appeal if the appeal is time-barred and dismissed, considering the pending delay condonation application. This decision underscores the significance of a valid and timely appeal process in determining the subject-matter of appeal in penalty proceedings under the IT Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 239 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63843</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi-B allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the time-barred penalty order of Rs. 4,25,313 under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1998-99. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment order cannot be the subject of appeal if the appeal is time-barred and dismissed, considering the pending delay condonation application. This decision underscores the significance of a valid and timely appeal process in determining the subject-matter of appeal in penalty proceedings under the IT Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>