<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 394 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the assessment year 1995-96, ruling it null and void due to improper service of notice and lack of jurisdiction by the ITO, Bulandshahar. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements under section 282 of the IT Act and ensuring proper jurisdiction for issuing notices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2024 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 394 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the assessment order for the assessment year 1995-96, ruling it null and void due to improper service of notice and lack of jurisdiction by the ITO, Bulandshahar. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements under section 282 of the IT Act and ensuring proper jurisdiction for issuing notices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>