<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 303 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the Director of IT (Exemption)&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263 of the IT Act, 1961, for erroneous assessment orders. It held that the Assessing Officer had appropriately applied provisions under Section 11 for exemptions, emphasizing that divergent opinions alone did not warrant Section 263. The Tribunal affirmed the charitable nature of the assessee&#039;s activities, dismissing claims of violations under Section 13 and treating contributions from member institutions as specific-purpose funds, not income. The appeal was allowed, rejecting the DI&#039;s revisionary actions and upholding the AO&#039;s exemption decisions under Section 11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:47:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 303 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the Director of IT (Exemption)&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263 of the IT Act, 1961, for erroneous assessment orders. It held that the Assessing Officer had appropriately applied provisions under Section 11 for exemptions, emphasizing that divergent opinions alone did not warrant Section 263. The Tribunal affirmed the charitable nature of the assessee&#039;s activities, dismissing claims of violations under Section 13 and treating contributions from member institutions as specific-purpose funds, not income. The appeal was allowed, rejecting the DI&#039;s revisionary actions and upholding the AO&#039;s exemption decisions under Section 11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>