<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63761</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the carry forward of losses was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the extension application and rectify the order under section 154 if appropriate. However, the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 22,955 for incentive payments to doctors was dismissed, upholding the disallowance based on the lack of evidence and the earlier judicial precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:51:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 97 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63761</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the carry forward of losses was allowed for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the extension application and rectify the order under section 154 if appropriate. However, the appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 22,955 for incentive payments to doctors was dismissed, upholding the disallowance based on the lack of evidence and the earlier judicial precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63761</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>