<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (5) TMI 67 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63742</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of car expenses and depreciation, as well as the rejection of collection charges for the house property, dismissing the departmental appeal. The tribunal considered the nature of the business, the partners&#039; roles, and the services rendered in allowing the claims, directing the Income Tax Officer to accept the deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:58:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (5) TMI 67 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63742</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of car expenses and depreciation, as well as the rejection of collection charges for the house property, dismissing the departmental appeal. The tribunal considered the nature of the business, the partners&#039; roles, and the services rendered in allowing the claims, directing the Income Tax Officer to accept the deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>