<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63738</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted 100% depreciation on steel shuttering plates and tubular scaffoldings, allowing the assessee&#039;s claim under section 32(1)(ii) of the IT Act. However, the tribunal upheld the denial of investment allowance and relief under section 80J, as the assessee, engaged in construction activities, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking based on the nature of its primary business activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:50:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (2) TMI 153 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63738</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted 100% depreciation on steel shuttering plates and tubular scaffoldings, allowing the assessee&#039;s claim under section 32(1)(ii) of the IT Act. However, the tribunal upheld the denial of investment allowance and relief under section 80J, as the assessee, engaged in construction activities, did not qualify as an industrial undertaking based on the nature of its primary business activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>