<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63731</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete the disallowance of interest paid by the assessee company to the bank. It was found that the assessee did not undertake any new construction project but was engaged in money lending activities with sister concerns. Therefore, the interest paid was considered allowable as a deduction, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:37:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 165 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63731</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A) decision to delete the disallowance of interest paid by the assessee company to the bank. It was found that the assessee did not undertake any new construction project but was engaged in money lending activities with sister concerns. Therefore, the interest paid was considered allowable as a deduction, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>