<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (10) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders due to procedural lapses and lack of proper inquiry. The assessment under Section 144 was deemed hasty and irregular, violating principles of natural justice. The CIT(A) failed to adequately verify creditor evidence, leading to a directive for a fresh assessment by the ITO, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:31:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (10) TMI 73 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders due to procedural lapses and lack of proper inquiry. The assessment under Section 144 was deemed hasty and irregular, violating principles of natural justice. The CIT(A) failed to adequately verify creditor evidence, leading to a directive for a fresh assessment by the ITO, ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to be heard. Appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>