<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63701</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax case involving issues related to the calculation of expected yield of lime, a discrepancy in stock statements, and the disallowance of bad debts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of substantiated evidence, reasonableness in production variations, and the lack of mandatory legal proceedings for bad debt allowance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (12) TMI 138 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63701</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax case involving issues related to the calculation of expected yield of lime, a discrepancy in stock statements, and the disallowance of bad debts. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made by the Assessing Officer, emphasizing the importance of substantiated evidence, reasonableness in production variations, and the lack of mandatory legal proceedings for bad debt allowance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>