<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63676</link>
    <description>Amounts deducted from contract receipts as security deposits were treated as part of the gross accruals and not excluded in computing taxable income, because no accounting basis or contrary material showed they were deductible. The net effect was that the exclusion was disallowed. A net profit rate of 7.5% on the contract receipts was also accepted as a reasonable estimate in the absence of material justifying a different figure, so that estimate was sustained for income computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 12:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63676</link>
      <description>Amounts deducted from contract receipts as security deposits were treated as part of the gross accruals and not excluded in computing taxable income, because no accounting basis or contrary material showed they were deductible. The net effect was that the exclusion was disallowed. A net profit rate of 7.5% on the contract receipts was also accepted as a reasonable estimate in the absence of material justifying a different figure, so that estimate was sustained for income computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>