https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63601 The Tribunal found the procedural defect in the property acquisition case to be curable and remanded the case for proper cross-examination of a key witness. The Commissioner was instructed to allow cross-examination of the witness by both transferors and transferee after summoning him. Additionally, the Commissioner was directed to investigate the unauthorized commercial use of the property by tenants during the sale to determine its impact on the property's value. The case was scheduled for further hearing based on the new evidence gathered within a sixty-day deadline. en-us Fri, 12 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:25:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63601 The Tribunal found the procedural defect in the property acquisition case to be curable and remanded the case for proper cross-examination of a key witness. The Commissioner was instructed to allow cross-examination of the witness by both transferors and transferee after summoning him. Additionally, the Commissioner was directed to investigate the unauthorized commercial use of the property by tenants during the sale to determine its impact on the property's value. The case was scheduled for further hearing based on the new evidence gathered within a sixty-day deadline. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 12 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63601