<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (7) TMI 82 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63593</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment, ruling in favor of the assessee, as it found that the tax authorities had not sufficiently proven their case. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and recommended further investigation into specific deposits, concluding that the burden of proof had not been adequately discharged by the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 09:58:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102035" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (7) TMI 82 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63593</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the assessment, ruling in favor of the assessee, as it found that the tax authorities had not sufficiently proven their case. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and recommended further investigation into specific deposits, concluding that the burden of proof had not been adequately discharged by the Income Tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>