<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63592</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the partners, finding that the omission to declare share income from a firm in their assessment was a bona fide mistake rather than deliberate concealment. As a result, penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 were deemed not leviable, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal considered the partners&#039; substantial income history and the circumstances of the newly formed firm in reaching this decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:57:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 58 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63592</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the partners, finding that the omission to declare share income from a firm in their assessment was a bona fide mistake rather than deliberate concealment. As a result, penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act, 1961 were deemed not leviable, and the appeals were allowed. The Tribunal considered the partners&#039; substantial income history and the circumstances of the newly formed firm in reaching this decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>