<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 195 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63588</link>
    <description>The Third Member concurred with the Judicial Member, mandating a thorough evaluation of all facts, circumstances, and arguments from both the assessee and the revenue. The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for further verification, ensuring comprehensive consideration of all relevant material and arguments, particularly those previously overlooked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 195 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63588</link>
      <description>The Third Member concurred with the Judicial Member, mandating a thorough evaluation of all facts, circumstances, and arguments from both the assessee and the revenue. The Tribunal directed the matter back to the Assessing Officer for further verification, ensuring comprehensive consideration of all relevant material and arguments, particularly those previously overlooked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>