<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling that no notional expenditure should be attributed to the steam unit, as the hot gas had no market value. It determined that only the sale of ash qualified as profits derived from the industrial undertaking for deductions under sections 80-I and 80-IA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=102008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 244 - ITAT DELHI-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, ruling that no notional expenditure should be attributed to the steam unit, as the hot gas had no market value. It determined that only the sale of ash qualified as profits derived from the industrial undertaking for deductions under sections 80-I and 80-IA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=63566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>